Cases 41 - 50 of 1,612
Schloss et al v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv10656
Plaintiff:
Catherine Schloss, Patricia Tate-Jackson and Darlene Wilson
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc., AT&T Services, Inc., State Street Global Advisors Trust Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Doe v. 399 Congress, LLC
as 1:2024cv10599
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
399 Congress, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Duarte v. Bridgewater State Hospital et al
as 1:2024cv10592
Plaintiff:
Eric J Duarte
Defendant:
Bridgewater State Hospital, Carol A. Mici, Steven Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hadley v. Capone et al
as 1:2024cv10520
Plaintiff:
Laura A. Hadley, Devol Pond Association, The 2021 Hadley Family Real Estate Trust and others
Defendant:
Chris Capone, Paul Joncas, Pamela Wilkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv10491
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv10492
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv10486
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv10493
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv10475
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
