Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Lamb v. City Of New York ; et al
as 1:2015cv06811
Plaintiff:
Thelma Lamb
Defendant:
City Of New York, NYPD Officers JOHN DOES 1-10 individually and NYPD Officers JOHN DOES 1-10 in their official capacities
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brandon v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2015cv05289
Plaintiff:
Michelle Brandon
Defendant:
The City Of New York , and Police Officers "John Doe" 1-3 Individually and in their Official Capacities
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferrari v. County of Suffolk
as 15-975
Plaintiff - Appellee:
James B. Ferrari
Defendant:
Christine Malafi and John Doe, 1-10, individually
Defendant - Appellant:
County of Suffolk
Rentas v. The City of New York
as 14-2512
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Axel Rentas
Defendant:
Correction Officer Richard Serrano, Shield No. 2037, in his Official Capacity, City of New York, Correction Officers John Doe, #1-10, Individually and in their Official Capacities and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Captain John Ruffin, Sheild No. 488, Individually and in his Official Capacity
Rentas v. The City of New York
as 14-2475
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Axel Rentas
Defendant:
Correction Officer Richard Serrano, Shield No. 2037, in his Official Capacity and Correction Officers John Doe, #1-10, Individually and in their Official Capacities
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, Correction Officer Diana Baker, Sheild No. 13239, Individually and in her Official Capacity, Correction Officer Kevin Parker, Shield No. 15629, Individually and in his Official Capacity and others
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Captain John Ruffin, Sheild No. 488, Individually and in his Official Capacity
Schwartz v. City of New York
as 13-2870
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Pauline Schwartz
Defendant:
City of New York, John Does 1-10, Individually and In their official capacities and Jane Does 1-10, Individually and In their official capacities, (the name Jane Doe being fictitious as the true name arepresently unknown)
Defendant - Appellant:
James Marcantonatos, Jonathan Chin, shield No. 240, Julio Santiago, Shield No. 23556, individually and in their official capacities and others
Espinoza v. Brooklyn Metropolitan Detentio
as 13-2059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
George Espinoza
Defendant:
Brooklyn Metropolitan Detention Center and Cornell Companies/Moshannon Valley Correctional Center
Defendant - Appellee:
Zenk, Warden, Lamadue, Unit Manager, Francisco, Case Manager and others
MacNamara v. City of New York
as 12-4483
Plaintiff:
Chris J. Kornicke, Julia Cohen, Julia Cohen and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Stacy Cotler, Rachel Heinold, Danielle Walsh and others
Defendant:
David Cohen, Deputy Commissioner for Legal Matters, New York City Police Department
Defendant - Appellant:
City of New York, a municipal entity, Michael Bloomberg, Mayor of the City of New York, Raymond Kelly, New York City Police Commissioner and others
Garcia v. Bloomberg
as 12-2634
Plaintiff:
Marcel Cartier, as Class Representative on behalf of himself and others similarly situated
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Karina Garcia, as Class Representative on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, Yari Osorio, as Class Representative on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, Benjamin Becker, as Class Representative on behalf of himself and others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
Raymond W. Kelly, Individually and in his official capacity, City of New York and Michael R. Bloomberg, in his official capacity and Individually
Defendant - Appellant:
Jane and John Does 1-40, Individually and in their official capacities
Manko v. Steinhardt
as 12-2114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Nella Manko
Defendant:
John Doe, 1-3, individually and in official capacity
Defendant - Appellee:
Marsha L. Steinhardt, individually and in her official Capacity as Justice of the New York State Supreme Court of Kings County, Sylvia O. Hinds-Radix, in her official capacity as Administrative Judge of Supreme Court, Kings County, Kings County Supreme Court of the State of New York and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
