Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Marvin Odom v. Bill Oldham, et al
as 14-6281
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN DEMETRIUS ODOM
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL OLDHAM, Shelby County Sheriff, KIM PALMER, LT. WARD and others
Marvin Odom v. Bill Oldham, et al
as 14-6251
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN DEMETRIUS ODOM
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL OLDHAM, Shelby County Sheriff, KIM PALMER, CHIEF MOORE and others
PARNESS v. HENDRICKS et al
as 2:2013cv03642
Plaintiff:
MARTIN S. PARNESS
Defendant:
ROY L. HENDRICKS and JOHN DOES (1-15)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARNESS v. HENDRICKS et al
as 2:2013cv04056
Plaintiff:
MARTIN S. PARNESS
Defendant:
ROY L. HENDRICKS, ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and JOHN DOES (1-15)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Menser v. Wexford Health et al
as 2:2013cv00118
Plaintiff:
Donald Gaines Menser
Defendant:
Wexford Health, Enlers, Christopher Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Menser v. Wexford Health et al
as 1:2013cv00532
Plaintiff:
Donald Gaines Menser
Defendant:
Wexford Health , Enlers , Woodall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George Bartz v. Maggie Miller-Stout, et al
as 13-35380
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE BARTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
MAGGIE MILLER-STOUT, INMATE BANKING AND MAILROOM STAFF, JANE DOES 1-15 and others
Marvin Odom v. Bill Oldham, et al
as 13-5557
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN DEMETRIUS ODOM
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL OLDHAM, Shelby County Sheriff, KIM PALMER, LT. WARD and others
BROWN v. NEW JERSEY DOC et al
as 1:2012cv05070
Plaintiff:
JERRY BROWN
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DOC, JOHN DOE 1-15, JOHN DOE 16-30 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KITCHEN v. ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2012cv02199
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR KITCHEN
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN DOE (1-15) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
