Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Thornton v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Thornton
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharples v. Bebout et al
as 3:2023cv00997
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Sharples
Defendant:
Sgt. Bebout, Lt. Bebout, Lt. Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shifrin et al v. Does 1-78
as 1:2021cv00799
Defendant:
John Does 1-78, John Doe 12 and John Doe 17
Plaintiff:
Chicago Cosmetic Surgery Institute, LLC, David Shifrin, Sheila Shifrin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hunter Killer Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-27
as 1:2019cv03594
Plaintiff:
Hunter Killer Productions, Inc. and Jane Doe#10
Defendant:
Does 1-27 and John Doe 17
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Bodyguard Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-18
as 1:2018cv02859
Plaintiff:
Bodyguard Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Does 1-18 and John Doe 17
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Bodyguard Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-19
as 1:2018cv02369
Plaintiff:
Bodyguard Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Does 1-19, John Doe 11 , John Doe 12 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Norwood v. Dart et al
as 1:2017cv05769
Plaintiff:
Randy Norwood
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, K. Johnson, Velez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flava Works, Inc v. John Doe 1 to 26 et al
as 1:2012cv05844
Plaintiff:
Flava Works, Inc
Defendant:
FF Magnat Limited, Earnwell Hong Kong LTD, Maxim Bochenko and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Doe 1 et al., v. The Catholic Archdiocese of Chicago, et al.,
as 1:2009cv07656
Plaintiff:
John Doe I, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Defendant:
The Catholic Archdiocese of Chicago, The Catholic Archdiocese of Chicago, The Catholic Archdiocese of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
