Cases 71 - 80 of 212
Petukh v. Neutron Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02382
Defendant:
Corporation Z, John Doe 2, Neutron Holdings, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Serge S. Petukh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jordan v. State of GA et al
as 1:2020cv02255
Defendant:
Officer John Doe 2, City of Atlanta, State of GA and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley H. Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREEN v. DREADEN et al
as 5:2020cv00195
Defendant:
GEORGIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE, JAMES R. ZIMMERMAN, YOUNG MI DREADEN and others
Plaintiff:
STANLEY GREEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOWLER v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2020cv00171
Defendant:
JOHN OR JANE DOE 1, CAPTAIN DAVIS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL LEWIS FOWLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glennon v. Performance Food Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00038
Defendant:
Performance Food Group, Inc., John Doe 2 and John Doe 1
Plaintiff:
Lisa Glennon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Stone v. Augusta University Medical Center et al
as 1:2020cv00021
Defendant:
Augusta University Medical Center, Dr. John Doe 2, Dr. John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tabor v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv05531
Plaintiff:
Celisa Tabor
Defendant:
Reginald Johnson, Claude S. Lett, Ted Philbin and others
Bell v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2019cv05392
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Erika Shields, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Walvella W. Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sally v. The City of Roswell et al
as 1:2019cv04969
Defendant:
Officer A. Irwin, Officer N. Carter, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Moses Sally
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sherman v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03368
Plaintiff:
Dolores C. Sherman
Defendant:
John Doe 2, John Doe 1 and Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
