Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Rogers v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 1:2021cv04129
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Rogers
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Deputy Dunker and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacobson v. NaphCare Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03632
Plaintiff:
David Otto Jacobson
Defendant:
Naph Care Inc., Medical Director at Fulton County Jail, John Does (I-III) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kesete v. 2 DeKalb County Police Officers
as 1:2021cv03394
Plaintiff:
Noheme Kesete
Defendant:
2 Dekalb County Police Officers, Officer John Doe 1 and Officer John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diarra v. Cobb County Detention Facility et al
as 1:2021cv00479
Defendant:
Sheriff, Cobb County Detention Facility, Officer Floyd, Jeffrey and others
Plaintiff:
Moussa Diarra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. Pounds et al
as 1:2021cv00112
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Sgt. Miranda, John Doe #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Chambers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SEATS v. MAJORS et al
as 3:2020cv00127
Defendant:
OFFICER BRANDON TEMPLES, OFFICER JOHN DOE 2, OFFICER NATHAN MAJORS and others
Plaintiff:
MOSES SOLOMON ISAIAH SEATS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irvin v. Coleman et al
as 5:2020cv00109
Defendant:
FNU Heaton, Tommie Boggs, FNU Kitchen and others
Plaintiff:
Freddie Lewis Irvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. State of GA et al
as 1:2020cv02255
Defendant:
Officer John Doe 2, City of Atlanta, State of GA and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley H. Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOWLER v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2020cv00171
Defendant:
JOHN OR JANE DOE 1, CAPTAIN DAVIS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL LEWIS FOWLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph v. City of Baldwin Police Department et al
as 2:2019cv00147
Defendant:
John Doe #5, John Doe #4, Chief of Police and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Brian Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
