Cases 21 - 30 of 123
Jessie Johnpillai v. Annette Chambers-Smith, et al
as 22-3708
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSIE JOHNPILLAI
Defendant / Appellee:
ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, HAROLD MAY, Warden, CHARLOTTE OWENS, Warden and others
Tyrone Bell v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 22-1702
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRONE ANTHONY BELL
Defendant / Appellee:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, ROBERT NAPLE, CONNIE HORTON and others
Tyrone Bell v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 22-1697
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRONE ANTHONY BELL
Defendant / Appellee:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, ROBERT NAPLE, CONNIE HORTON and others
Monaco v. John Doe (1) et al
as 2:2022cv02888
Plaintiff:
Jason David Monaco
Defendant:
John Doe (1), John Doe (2), John Doe (3) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glaze v. Morgan et al
as 1:2022cv00379
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric A. Glaze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillip Bloodworth v. Mark Pouperd, et al
as 22-3445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILLIP BLOODWORTH
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTION OFFICER MARK POUPERD, JOHN DOE 1, 1st Shift Commander, CORRECTION OFFICER FORD and others
Perry v. Erdos et al
as 1:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Perry
Defendant:
Ronald Erdos, Lieutenant Fry, Officer Robert Dofflemyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kendrick v. Chamber-Smith et al
as 1:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Mark Kendrick
Defendant:
Annette Chamber-Smith, Ronald T. Erdos, Linnea Mahlman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brinegar v. London, Kentucky et al
as 6:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Cody M. Brinegar
Defendant:
London, Kentucky, Laurel County, Kentucky, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. State of Michigan et al
as 2:2022cv10631
Plaintiff:
Benjamen Hill
Defendant:
State of Michigan, Kyle Echler, Jennifer Hern and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
