Cases 91 - 100 of 568
Scott v. Waterstraat et al
as 3:2022cv03116
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott
Defendant:
Waterstraat, . Bowen, John Doe, 11 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wade v. Luster et al
as 1:2022cv03040
Plaintiff:
Ronald Wade
Defendant:
Mark Luster, Jamar Range, Roy Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cerritos v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2022cv01214
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo A. Cerritos
Defendant:
John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Layne v. Butler et al
as 1:2022cv01178
Plaintiff:
Deantonio Layne
Defendant:
Kevin Butler, Dan Scaurdan, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walls v. Thompson et al
as 3:2022cv01099
Plaintiff:
Nirin Walls
Defendant:
Christopher S. Thompson, Robert E. Wegman, Brandon A. Westbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Purdle v. Grimes et al
as 3:2022cv01044
Plaintiff:
Kencey Purdle
Defendant:
Grimes, John Doe 1, Purdue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ratliff v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01039
Plaintiff:
Ryan Ratliff
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Rob Jeffreys, Assistant Warden Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bey et al v. Ayers et al
as 1:2022cv02440
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Bey and Muhammad Bey Express Trust 1st lien holders and beneficial owners of MUHAMMAD LAWAL
Defendant:
Clarence D Ayers, Kimberly Abogunrin, Gerald E. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Maze v. Ahmed et al
as 3:2022cv00980
Plaintiff:
Paul D. Maze
Defendant:
Faisal Ahmed, Ms. Brazzell, E. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Williams v. Spiller et al
as 3:2022cv00756
Plaintiff:
Willie E. Williams
Defendant:
William A. Spiller, Joshua A. Schoenbeck, Jason N. Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
