Cases 1 - 10 of 30
MARSHALL v. WADAS et al
as 2:2024cv00140
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, J. WADAS, BOP and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN K. MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
WEATHERS v. FRANCIS et al
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND L. WEATHERS, JR.
Defendant:
FRANCIS, JOHN DOE #1 and JOHN DOE #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARISH v. HINSHAW et al
as 2:2023cv00575
Plaintiff:
TONY PARISH
Defendant:
JEFFREY HINSHAW, PENNINGTON, ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUMLER v. CENTURION MEDICAL et al
as 2:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN LEE RUMLER
Defendant:
CENTURION MEDICAL, KIM HOSSON, S. BEDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHANDLER v. WILLIS et al
as 1:2023cv01710
Plaintiff:
KEITH CHANDLER
Defendant:
G. WILLIS, JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FROGGE v. SHELBY COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER et al
as 1:2023cv01436
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL DALE FROGGE
Defendant:
SHELBY COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER, JOHN DOE #1 and JOHN DOE #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. DOE #1 et al
as 2:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, JOHN JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SILVERS v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00441
Plaintiff:
KERRY E. SILVERS
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITFIELD v. DOE #1 et al
as 1:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
NARVEL WHITFIELD
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1 and JOHN DOE #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELDRIDGE v. WEDDELL et al
as 1:2022cv02005
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ELDRIDGE
Defendant:
BRANDON WEDDELL, KONKLE, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
