Cases 1 - 9 of 9
White #838737 v. Chippewa Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Marquise White #838737
Defendant:
Chippewa Correctional Facility, Unknown Desrochers, Chippewa Correctional Facility Warden's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vandee #542173 v. Corrigan et al
as 2:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
Tony Leroy Vandee #542173
Defendant:
James Corrigan, Unknown Part(y)(ies), Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hickey #342571 v. Stump et al
as 1:2022cv00865
Plaintiff:
Kainte Hickey #342571
Defendant:
Unknown Stump, Unknown Nelson, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alzid v. Porter et al
as 1:2021cv00942
Plaintiff:
Majid Alzid and Christopher Morgan
Defendant:
Gizelle Porter, Jeffery Stokes, Scott Corrion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson #381114 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00229
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, L. Parish, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Lamar Jackson #381114
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark #222915 v. Derry et al
as 2:2011cv00253
Plaintiff:
Aaron Clark #222915
Defendant:
Arthur J. Derry, Unknown Miller, A. MacArthur and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovely #210684 v. Armstrong et al
as 2:2011cv00204
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lovely #210684
Defendant:
James Armstrong, Veda Dove, Patricia Caruso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tuttle #374487 v. Boynton et al
as 2:2008cv00113
Plaintiff:
Winfred Tuttle #374487
Defendant:
John Boynton, John Doe #1, Duncan MacLaren and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Boyd #145030 v. Guinn et al
as 2:2007cv00257
Plaintiff:
Clifton Boyd #145030
Defendant:
David Guinn, Michigan Department of Corrections Health Care Marquette, Sandy Shuker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
