Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Gardenhire et al v. Montana Midwest, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00051
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Gardenhire and Arleen H. Gardenhire
Defendant:
Montana Midwest, Inc., Abraham Mairena, Ralph D. Napoli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Dolgencorp, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv02019
Plaintiff:
John Smith
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, LLC and John Does I-X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Fluhrer v. United States of America et al
as 4:2015cv00165
Plaintiff:
Christine Fluhrer
Defendant:
United States of America, Robert Zabenko, Julius R. Theophilus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cooper v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
as 5:2011cv05111
Plaintiff:
Jared Cooper
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Corporation , Toyota Motor Corporation, USA , Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
Nicole Atwood
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Toyota Motor Corporation and Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Taylor v. Northport Health Services Of Arkansas, L.L.C. et al
as 5:2008cv05039
Plaintiff:
James Taylor and James Taylor
Defendant:
Northport Health Services Of Arkansas, L.L.C., Northport Health Services, Inc., NHS Management, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Demott et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2007cv03273
Plaintiff:
Robin Demott, Robin Demott, Martha Demott and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Tabish v. Target Corporation et al
as 0:2007cv02303
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Tabish
Defendant:
Target Corporation, Huffy Corporation, Impact Resource Group, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
Target Corporation
Cross Defendant:
Huffy Corporation, Impact Resource Group, Inc. and National Product Services Acquisition Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
