Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Big Thyme Enterprises Inc v. David A Crotts & Associates Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00822
Plaintiff:
Big Thyme Enterprises Inc
Defendant:
David A Crotts & Associates Inc , David A Crotts , John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Joplin v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as TNE/1:12-cv-00073
Plaintiff:
Deborah Joplin
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon Women's Health & Urology and others
Prime PPV, Inc. v. John Doe d/b/a Colmado Soto et al
as 3:2011cv01906
Plaintiff:
Prime PPV, Inc.
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Jane Doe 1, Conjugal Partnership Doe 1-Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 25
Center For Armenian Remembrance v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System et al
as 1:2011cv01483
Plaintiff:
Center For Armenian Remembrance
Defendant:
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Federal Reserve Bank of New York and John Doe #1 through John Doe # 10
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Iliff et al v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 1:2011cv01098
Plaintiff:
Todd R Iliff , Arlyn James Miller , Robert Goltermann and others
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co. , JP Morgan Clearing Corp. , JP Morgan Securities Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Iliff et al v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 1:2011cv00400
Plaintiff:
Todd R Iliff , Arlyn James Miller , Robert Goltermann and others
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co., JP Morgan Clearing Corp., JP Morgan Securities Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. Infinity Health Products, Ltd. et al
as 1:2010cv05611
Defendant:
Aleksander Afanasyev, Amega Inc., Betty Andresol and others
Plaintiff:
Geico Casualty Co., Geico General Insurance Company, Geico Indemnity Co. and others
Indentity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Viss Supply, Inc:
John Doe 1
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of West Coast, Inc:
John Doe 10
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Chesteron, Inc:
John Doe 11
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Tita Co:
John Doe 12
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Bilt-Rite Orthopedics & Safety, Inc:
John Doe 13
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Wellcore Wholesale, Inc:
John Doe 14
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Galasa, Inc:
John Doe 15
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Eco Wholesale, Inc:
John Doe 2
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Mikos Trading, Inc:
John Doe 3
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of MDSS Wholesale, Inc:
John Doe 4
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Excell Plus, Inc:
John Doe 5
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Riviera Wholesale, Inc:
John Doe 6
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Optom Inc:
John Doe 7
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Delazoom, Inc:
John Doe 8
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of New Step Services, Inc:
John Doe 9
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of John Doe Corporations 1-10:
John Does 16-25
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Motion for Courtroom Closure et al v. USA
as 1:2010mc00541
Petitioner:
John Doe 10 cr 172
In Re:
Motion for Courtroom Closure
Respondent:
USA
Almeida-Leon et al v. R-G Premiere Bank of Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2010cv01715
Plaintiff:
Francisco Almeida-Leon , Wanda Cruz-Quiles , Juan Almeida-Leon and others
Defendant:
R-G Premiere Bank of Puerto Rico, Victor M. Irizarry-Nieves, Pedro Diaz-Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1971
EL-BEY v. U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2010cv01716
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA EMANUEL EL-BEY
Defendant:
U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC, JP MORGAN MORTGAGE ACQUISITION CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
