Cases 1 - 6 of 6
United States of America v. Reyes Vazquez et al
as 3:2019cv02153
Defendant:
Joel H. Rivera, Estate of German Reyes Vazquez, Hilda Reyes Lozada and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America - Farm Service Agency and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America (Farm Service Agency) v. Fernandez Ramos et al
as 3:2019cv02034
Defendant:
Victor Roberto Fernandez Ramos, Carmen Aurea Fernandez Ramos, John Doe & Richard Roe and others
Interested Party:
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
Plaintiff:
United States of America (Farm Service Agency) and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Negron-Davila et al v. De Diego Ambulatory Clinic Corp et al
as 3:2010cv01785
Defendant:
De Diego Ambulatory Clinic Corp, Hospital Espanol Auxilio Mutuo de Puerto Rico, Dr. Javier Rodriguez-Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Myriam Negron-Davila , Militza Perez-Negron and Ivan Perez-Negron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Medero-Diaz et al v. Roman et al
as 3:2010cv01695
Plaintiff:
Homayra Medero-Diaz , freddie jose zayas , Conjugal Partnership Medero-Zayas and others
Defendant:
John Roman, Jennifer Vargas, Lieutenant Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez-Lasalle v. Centro Medico del Turabo
as 3:2010cv01280
Plaintiff:
Segundo Hernandez-Lasalle
Defendant:
Centro Medico del Turabo, HIMA San Pablo Captive Insurance Company Limited, SIMED as insurance carrier of Dr. Jose Luis Pagan Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Miranda et al v. Melendez-Nieves et al
as 3:2009cv02068
Plaintiff:
Minerva Miranda, Gladys Vitales and Delsa Maria Natal Ruiz
Defendant:
Maritza Melendez-Nieves, SIMED as insurance carrier of Dr. Maritza Melendez, Centro Medico del Turabo d/b/a Hospital HIMA San Pablo Fajardo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
