Cases 1 - 10 of 234
BALL v. DOES 1-X et al
as 4:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
DENNIS ANDREW BALL
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-X, JANE DOES 1-X, ABC CORPORATIONS 1-X and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Doe (RWC) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
John Doe (RWC)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Doe (WDM) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
John Doe (WDM)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #1 (ELA) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (ELA), John Doe #2 (BMA), John Doe #3 (RNB) and others
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Doe Corporation v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
as 4:2024cv01103
Plaintiff:
John Doe Corporation
Defendant:
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
John Doe #1 (EDB) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (EDB) and John Doe #2 (WEB)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Doe (WEA) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
John Doe (WEA)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #1 (LWB) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (LWB), John Doe #2 (DBB) and John Doe #3 (BAR)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe (DJB) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
John Doe (DJB)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv10291
Plaintiff:
RoShieka Charisma Jones
Defendant:
LaTonya Ann Jones and John Doe
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
