Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Colston et al v. Ameritas Holding Company et al
as 4:2023cv03137
Plaintiff:
Amber Colston, Willis Bramwell and Roseann Blessing
Defendant:
Ameritas Holding Company, The Board of Directors of Ameritas Holding Company, The Ameritas 401(k) Retirement Plan Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Fitzpatrick et al v. Nebraska Methodist Health System, Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Linda A. Fitzpatrick, Michael W. Peters and Mary E. Becklun
Defendant:
Nebraska Methodist Health System, Inc., The Board of Directors of Nebraska Methodist Health System, Inc., Nebraska Methodist Health System, Inc. Participant Directed Investment Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Jensen v. First National of Nebraska, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv00323
Defendant:
John Doe # 5, John Doe #1, First National Advisors, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Amanda D. Jensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scott v. Woodhouse Ford, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv00260
Plaintiff:
Shari L. Scott
Defendant:
Woodhouse Ford, Inc., John Does I-V, Woodhouse CBP, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lechner v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company et al
as 8:2018cv00022
Defendant:
John Does 1-50, United of Omaha Life Insurance Company and Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Tamera S. Lechner, Regina K. White and Steven D. Gifford
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Laird v. Lundstrom et al
as 4:2010cv03139
Defendant:
Samuel P. Baird, John Doe 1-10, Charles W. Hoskins and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald A Laird
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Bredthauer
as 4:2010cv03132
Defendant:
Samuel P. Baird, Delaware Charter Guarantee & Trust Company, Jane Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Susan E. Bredthauer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
