Cases 11 - 20 of 575
Cislo v. Price et al
as 3:2024cv00173
Defendant:
Cameron Price, Cameron B Price and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Bee Cislo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. English et al
as 3:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Lavelle Malone
Defendant:
English, Aaron Smith, Mallot and others
Not Yet Classified:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foor v. English et al
as 3:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Phillip Zachary Foor
Defendant:
English, Dentist, Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foor v. English et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Phillip Zachary Foor
Defendant:
English, Dentist, Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAYNE v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
NICK D. PAYNE
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, FONSECA, COATIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REEVES v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
RICHARD REEVES
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, EMERSON, NEWMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. ARMSTRONG et al
as 1:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
STACY SMITH
Defendant:
LISA ARMSTRONG, OFFICER COUCH, MEGAN OLSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGruder v. Camery et al
as 1:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Makiyah McGruder
Defendant:
Jason Camery, Treon, McMullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WEATHERS v. FRANCIS et al
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND L. WEATHERS, JR.
Defendant:
FRANCIS, JOHN DOE #1 and JOHN DOE #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMS v. DENMEN et al
as 1:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
JOHN SIMS
Defendant:
DENMEN, LEE, SHERRY DON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
