Cases 11 - 20 of 1,927
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Davenport, Fred v. Steingraeber, Brooke et al
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Fred Lee Davenport
Defendant:
Brooke Steingraeber, Kyle Ferstl, Jane Doe 1 and others
Not Yet Classified:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilks, Timothy v. Hannula, J. et al
as 3:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Timothy B. Wilks
Defendant:
Dr. J. Hannula, Dr. R. Maddikunta, RN E. Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahajni v. Milwaukee County et al
as 2:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Marwan Mahajni
Defendant:
Milwaukee County, Deputy Vo Do, Deputy Scott Woida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watson, Atlas v. Doe 1 thru 12, John et al
as 3:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Atlas Watson
Defendant:
Staff John Doe 1 thru 12, Staff Jane Doe 1 thru 12, Dr. Ledesma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keplin v. Doe #1-4
as 2:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Dennis Keplin
Defendant:
John Doe #1-4
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 25 Fraud - Commodities Leverage Contracts
Hooks v. Lifted Made et al
as 2:2024cv00209
Defendant:
JESSIE HOOKS, LIFTED MADE dba LIFTED LIQUIDS, URB CANNABIS, Parent Co to Lifted Made and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
