Cases 21 - 27 of 27
HALL v. BOROUGH OF SEASIDE HEIGHTS et al
as 3:2007cv03969
Plaintiff:
JAMES HALL
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF SEASIDE HEIGHTS, JOHN DOES 1-10, THOMAS BOYD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOSKOWITZ v. BOROUGH OF SEASIDE HEIGHTS et al
as 3:2007cv03120
Plaintiff:
DAVID JOSKOWITZ
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF SEASIDE HEIGHTS, MICHAEL FRAAS, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CASEY v. BOROUGH OF SEASIDE PARK et al
as 3:2007cv02704
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER CASEY
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF SEASIDE PARK, BOROUGH OF SEASIDE PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, WILLIAM BEINING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TEAGUE v. BOROUGH OF SEASIDE PARK et al
as 3:2007cv02222
Plaintiff:
RICHARD L. TEAGUE, JR.
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF SEASIDE PARK, ROBERT MATTHIES, ROBERT MARTUCCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BELOWSKI v. BOROUGH OF SEASIDE PARK et al
as 3:2007cv01770
Plaintiff:
JAMES PAUL BELOWSKI
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF SEASIDE PARK, BOROUGH OF SEASIDE PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, WILLIAM BEINING and others
Counter Claimant:
JAMES CITTA, ROBERT MATTHIES, ROBERT MARTUCCI and others
Counter Defendant:
JAMES PAUL BELOWSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MANELSKI et al v. TINICUM TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2007cv01487
Plaintiff:
DENISE MANELSKI, DENISE MANELSKI, DENISE MANELSKI and others
Defendant:
TINICUM TOWNSHIP, TINICUM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, PETER J. BILLBROUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PEGUERO v. BOROUGH OF SEASIDE PARK et al
as 3:2007cv01323
Plaintiff:
JEAN PEGUERO
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF SEASIDE PARK, ROBERT MATTHIES, ROBERT MARTUCCI and others
Counter Claimant:
MARYANNE PALMISANO, JOHN MOYSE, JOHN DOES 11-15 and others
Counter Defendant:
JEAN PEGUERO and JEAN PEGUERO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
