Cases 1 - 10 of 110
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00919
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00810
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00797
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Brinton v. One Technologies LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00656
Plaintiff:
Nathan Brinton
Defendant:
One Technologies LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Knotts et al v. The University of Texas System et al
as 3:2023cv02369
Plaintiff:
Joceyln Nanette Knotts, Kenith Wayne Price, Kenith Price and others
Defendant:
The University of Texas System and John Does #1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Western Dental Services Inc et al
as 4:2023cv01051
Plaintiff:
Delisa M. Harris
Defendant:
Western Dental Services, Inc., Brident Services, LLC and John Does 1-10 4:23-cv-1051-P
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Goad et al v. Lyde et al
as 7:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
Landon Paul Goad and Sarah Lynn Johnson
Defendant:
Jeff Lyde, Clay County, Texas and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
