Cases 11 - 20 of 2,837
Laccinole v. Secure One Financial, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01336
Plaintiff:
Christopher Laccinole
Defendant:
Secure One Financial, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Morrow v. Genius Fund, et al.
as 24-2306
Plaintiff:
ANDREA MORROW
Defendant:
GENIUS FUND, LIAM PALMIERI, CHRIS FINELLI and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting
Accardi v. County of Suffolk
as 24-903
Plaintiff:
JAMES K. ACCARDI
Defendant:
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, SUFFOLK COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Lieutenant ANDREW MANFREDONIA and others
Ezekwo v. St. Philip Neri
as 24-892
Plaintiff:
Dr. IFEOMA EZEKWO
Defendant:
ST. PHILIP NERI CATHOLIC CHURCH, Bronx, New York, RICHARD COPPOLA, Esq., Rev. Msgr JOSEPH P. LAMORTE and others
Soley v. County of Nassau
as 24-880
Plaintiff:
EAN SOLEY
Defendant:
COUNTY OF NASSAU, NASSAU COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, P.O. OMAR D. GALAN, Shield 3660 and others
Gray v. Kohl's, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Melissa A. Gray
Defendant:
Kohl's, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Mazen Agha v. SoFi Lending Corp., et al
as 24-1485
Plaintiff:
MAZEN HASAN AGHA
Defendant:
SOFI LENDING CORP., SOFI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-10
BUENAVENTURA et al v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT et al
as 2:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
IAN R BUENAVENTURA
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, LLOYD J AUSTIN, III, JOHN DOES (1-10) and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Cohen v. Arnold Scott Harris, P.C. et al
as 1:2024cv02324
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Cohen
Defendant:
Arnold Scott Harris, P.C., Harris & Harris, Ltd. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
