Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Winston, Michael v. Pamela H. et al
as 3:2016cv00610
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Winston
Defendant:
Pamela H. , Lori Yokey, Johnson (1) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Higgins v. Gossage et al
as 2:2016cv01189
Plaintiff:
Tony Higgins
Defendant:
John Gossage, Brown County Jail Health Services and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks, Michael v. Chippewa County et al
as 3:2016cv00347
Plaintiff:
Michael Parks
Defendant:
Chippewa County , James Kowalczyk , John Doe 1-10/ Maker of the belt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinley Bey v. Pollard et al
as 2:2016cv00521
Plaintiff:
La Ron McKinley Bey
Defendant:
William Pollard , Brian Foster, Tony Meli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chaban v. William et al
as 1:2015cv01926
Defendant:
William, Jane & John Does 1-5, Nicholas Lamb and others
Plaintiff:
Chaban and William Chaban
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith, Richard v. Martin et al
as 3:2014cv00429
Plaintiff:
Richard Thomas Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Martin , Tammy Maassen, Tidquist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harmon v. Cook County Jail & Stateville Correctional Officers et al
as 1:2014cv00417
Plaintiff:
Austin Harmon
Defendant:
Cook County Jail & Stateville Correctional Officers, John Does (1-10), County Jail/Cermak Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clarence Easterling v. Chris Moeller, et al
as 10-3080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLARENCE M. EASTERLING
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRIS MOELLER, DAVE PEHL and JOHN DOE, 1-10
Voorhis v. Gaetz et al
as 1:2009cv01089
Plaintiff:
Darren L Voorhis
Defendant:
Donald Gaetz, Edward Jones, . Evans and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Clarence Easterling v. Chris Moeller, et al
as 08-3741
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLARENCE M. EASTERLING
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRIS MOELLER, DAVE PEHL and JOHN DOE, sued as: John Doe 1-10
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
