Cases 11 - 20 of 333
BOND v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2022cv01524
Plaintiff:
JESSE D. BOND
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, GEORGE M. LITTLE and PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRITT v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv01325
Plaintiff:
JORI BRITT
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SECRETARY JOHN E. WETZEL, SUPERINTENDENT JAMIE SORBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PEREZ v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2022cv00493
Plaintiff:
ALBERT PEREZ
Defendant:
MR. JOHN E. WETZEL, MR. JAIME SORBER and JANE/JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHOLAVER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2022cv00492
Plaintiff:
ERNEST RAY WHOLAVER, JR.
Defendant:
MR. JOHN E. WETZEL, MR. JAMIE SORBER and JANE/JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAY et al v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2022cv00326
Plaintiff:
LANDON MAY and ROBERT WHARTON
Defendant:
Former Secretary JOHN E. WETZEL and Dept (of) Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HARRIS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2022cv00107
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS BAUER HARRIS
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL and PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MITCHELL v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv05445
Plaintiff:
WAYNE MITCHELL
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, GEORGE M. LITTLE, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONFORTI v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv05293
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CONFORTI
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL and PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARINELLI et al v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv05215
Plaintiff:
KEVIN J. MARINELLI, TEDOR DAVIDO, MELVIN KNIGHT and others
Defendant:
JOHN E WETZEL, GEORGE M LITTLE, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLEMONS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv05232
Plaintiff:
JORDAN CLEMONS
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL and PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
