Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Arizona
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
James v. Nanos et al
as 4:2024cv00030
Petitioner: John Edwards James, III
Respondent: Christopher Nanos and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James III v. Nanos et al
as 4:2021cv00341
Petitioner: John Edwards James and John Edwards James, III
Respondent: Christopher Nanos and Tucson Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
James v. Nanos et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00305
Plaintiff: John Edward James, III
Defendant: Christopher Nanos, Unknown Party, Unknown Adale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lofton v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv00714
Respondent: David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner: John Edward Lofton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sansing v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv00382
Defendant: Jason Monson and David Shinn
Plaintiff: John Edward Sansing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNeill v. Walker
as 4:2018cv00471
Plaintiff: John Edward McNeill
Defendant: Jacob Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Briscoe v. Penzone et al
as 2:2018cv01245
Plaintiff: John Edward Briscoe, Jr.
Defendant: Paul Penzone, Unknown Kindell-House, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNeill v. St. Cyr et al
as 4:2015cv00479
Plaintiff: John Edward McNeill
Defendant: Timothy St. Cyr, Ronald Payette, James B Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharkey v. Escapule et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv08180
Petitioner: John Edward Sharkey
Respondent: Laura Escapule and Thomas C Horne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sublett v. Robertson et al
as 4:2011cv00539
Plaintiff: Horace Sublett
Defendant: David W Robertson, Paul Bosseler, Bruce E Kanter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?