Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Jones v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Brian Jones
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Cort L. O'Haver, Peggy Y. Fowler and others
Wilson v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Jordan Wilson
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Peggy Fowler, Stephen M. Gambee and others
CICCOTELLI v. UMPQUA HOLDINGS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv05610
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Defendant:
UMPQUA HOLDINGS CORPORATION, PEGGY YVONNE FLOWER, BRYAN L TIMM and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Mason v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10912
Plaintiff:
Richard Mason
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Peggy Y. Fowler, Cort Lane O'Haver and others
Green v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv06729
Plaintiff:
Mike Green
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Peggy Y. Fowler, Cort Lane OHaver and others
Mackie v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10237
Plaintiff:
Keith Mackie
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Peggy Yvonne Fowler, Bryan L. Timm and others
Wang v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10143
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Peggy Yvonne Fowler, Bryan L. Timm and others
Neely v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10171
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Neely
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Columbia Banking System, Inc., Cascade Merger Sub, Inc. and others
SCHULTZE v. KIJAKAZI
as 4:2021cv00159
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. SCHULTZE
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Abercrombie, et al v. Aetna Health, et al
as 16-1152
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAD ABERCROMBIE, TRENT ARTICHOKER, TROY BARRON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AETNA HEALTH, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation, ANTHEM BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD, a Colorado corporation, CIGNA HEALTHCARE OF COLORADO, INC., a Colorado corporation and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
