Cases 1 - 9 of 9
E. G., et al v. Schulz et al
as 2:2020cv02845
Plaintiff:
E. G., A MINOR CHILD, JOHN GARD, ADM ESTATE OF NATHANIEL GARD, E. G. and others
Defendant:
INMATE #a765597 KENNETH SCHULZ, JOHN FISHER, LICKING COUNTY JOB AND FAMILY SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chambers et al v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
as 1:2019cv02601
Plaintiff:
Sheena Hill, Wayne Eric Hopper, Patricia L. Chambers and others
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Smith et al v. Martin et al
as 2:2019cv00150
Plaintiff:
Archie Bradley, Tyler Faulk, John Fisher and others
Defendant:
Louis Edward Martin, III, Clear Fork Energy Services, LLC and John Russell Martin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Fisher v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2018cv01203
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garner et al v. Harrod et al
as 2:2013cv00678
Plaintiff:
Cameron D. Garner , Christina L. Garner , Audrey M. Moreland and others
Defendant:
Jessica Harrod, Licking County Department of Job and Family Services, Children Services Division, John Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Fisher v. Secoy et al
as 2:2012cv00734
Plaintiff:
John Fisher
Defendant:
Randy Secoy, Jimmy Joe Childs, John #1-#2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Liddy v. Megyesi et al
as 1:2012cv01774
Plaintiff:
Shirley Liddy
Defendant:
Joseph Megyesi, John Fisher, James Travano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fisher v. Dodson et al
as 2:2009cv00730
Plaintiff:
John Fisher
Defendant:
Chris Dodson, Jon Kullman, Robert Dorinsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Liddy v. Baumgart et al
as 1:2007cv03165
Plaintiff:
Richard Liddy, Sr.
Defendant:
Wayne Baumgart, James Tavano, Joseph Megyesi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
