Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Jordan v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2020cv00103
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
John Jordan, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. John Jordan, Jr.
as 18-13105
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN JORDAN, JR.
Jordan v. Stephens
as 2:2015cv02699
Petitioner:
John Jordan, Jr.
Respondent:
D. R. Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Michael McGee, et al v. Commonwealth Title, et al
as 12-11141
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL MCGEE, an Individual, REMA MCGEE, an Individual, ROBERT J RYAN, an Individual and others
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH TITLE, FIDELITY TITLE, COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Michael McGee, et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
as 12-10472
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL MCGEE, REME MCGEE, an Individual, ROBERT J RYAN, an Individual and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA, a New York corporation
McGee et al v. Stump, Storey, Callahan, Dietrich & Spears et al
as 8:2011cv01112
Plaintiff:
Michael McGee , Rema McGee , Robert J. Ryan and others
Defendant:
Stump, Storey, Callahan, Dietrich & Spears and W. Scott Callahan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
McGee et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. et al
as 8:2011cv01099
Plaintiff:
Michael McGee , Rema McGee , Robert J. Ryan and others
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. , National City Mortgage and Fifth Third Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McGee et al v. Commonwealth Title et al
as 8:2011cv01100
Plaintiff:
Michael McGee , Rema McGee , Robert J. Ryan and others
Defendant:
Commonwealth Title and Fidelity Title
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McGee et al v. Sarasota Cay Clubs COA Inc. et al
as 8:2011cv01098
Plaintiff:
Michael McGee , Rema McGee , Robert J. Ryan and others
Defendant:
Sarasota Cay Clubs COA Inc. and Derek Taylor
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
