Cases 1 - 9 of 9
John Kliesh v. Redevelopment Authority of Bucks County, et al
as 24-2283
Defendant:
JUDGE RAYMOND F. MCHUGH, ALLEN TOADVINE and REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF BUCKS COUNTY
Plaintiff:
JOHN KLIESH
KLIESH v. CASSIDY et al
as 2:2024cv01802
Plaintiff:
JOHN KLIESH
Defendant:
ANDREW G. CASSIDY, ROBERT O. BALDI, KRISTI B. HOOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KLIESH v. REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF BUCKS COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv00864
Plaintiff:
JOHN KLIESH
Defendant:
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF BUCKS COUNTY, ALLEN TOADVINE and JUDGE RAYMOND F. MCHUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Kliesh v. Redevelopment Authority of Bucks County, et al
as 23-1427
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN KLIESH
Defendant / Appellee:
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF BUCKS COUNTY, ALLEN TOADVINE and RAYMOND F. MCHUGH
KLIESH v. REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF BUCKS COUNTY et al
as 2:2021cv00733
Plaintiff:
JOHN KLIESH
Defendant:
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF BUCKS COUNTY, JUDGE RAYMOND F. MCHUGH and ALLEN TOADVINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Kliesh v. Select Portfolio Servicing Inc, et al
as 12-3955
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN KLIESH
Defendant - Appellee:
SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC, CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON (USA) and ECKERT, SEAMANS, CHERIN & MELLOTT
KLIESH v. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING et al
as 2:2012cv00548
Plaintiff:
JOHN KLIESH
Defendant:
SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING , CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON U.S.A. and ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731
John Kliesh v. Select Portfolio Ser
as 10-3175
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN KLIESH
Defendant - Appellee:
SELECT PORTFOLIO SER and CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON (USA)
KLIESH v. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC.
as 2:2009cv02726
Plaintiff:
JOHN KLIESH
Defendant:
SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
