Cases 21 - 30 of 124
Abdul Baaghil, et al v. Stephen Miller, et al
as 20-1802
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOHAMED ABDO ALI AHMED, MALEKAH ALI AL WAHASI, KHALED ABDO ALI AHMED and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES EMBASSY IN DJIBOUTI, LARRY EDWARD ANDRE, JR., Individually and in his capacity as Ambassador of the United States Embassy in Djibouti, STEPHEN MILLER, Individually and in his official capacity as the Senior Policy Advisory to the President of the United States and others
Plaintiff:
ABDUL KADER AHMED BAAGHIL
John Allen, Jr. v. Administrator New Jersey State, et al
as 20-2631
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN LEE ALLEN, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY and ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON
Brandon Mockbee v. John Lee, et al
as 20-2004
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN LEE, JENNIFER RIFLE, VINCE KLEE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON MOCKBEE
Brandon Mockbee v. John Lee, et al
as 20-1927
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN LEE, JENNIFER RIFLE, VINCE KLEE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON MOCKBEE
John Carter v. Randee Rewerts
as 20-1281
Respondent / Appellee:
RANDEE REWERTS
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN LEE CARTER
McCall, et al v. WestCare, et al
as 20-8002
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUG CHAMBERLAIN, PETER K. MICHAEL, M. OBERST and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL MILLER, KELVIN WILLIAMS, CODY SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
ELMER PETERSEN and DEON A. LEONARD
Johnson v. OK-DOC Board of Corrections, et al
as 19-5105
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL ROACH, Chairman of the Oklahoma Department of Corrections Board of Corrections and OK-DOC BOARD OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN LEE JOHNSON
John Carter v. Randee Rewerts
as 19-2316
Respondent / Appellee:
RANDEE REWERTS
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN LEE CARTER
USA v. John Collins
as 19-13686
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN LEE COLLINS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
