Cases 21 - 30 of 36
ALLEN v. MR. STEPHEN D'ILIO et al
as 3:2014cv04492
Petitioner:
JOHN LEE ALLEN, JR.
Respondent:
MR. STEPHEN D'ILIO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv04619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Harry Moses, et al v. Volvo Cars North America, et al
as 13-2210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARRY MOSES
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LYNN HENDERSON, KULON KRISTINA, KEVIN MORRIS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
VOLVO CARS NORTH AMERICA and VOLVO CAR CORPORATION
NICHOLSON v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv66578
Plaintiff:
JOHN LEE NICHOLSON
Defendant:
3M, ALLIS CHALMERS CORPORATION PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LONG et al v. AC&S, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv62013
Plaintiff:
JOHN LEE LONG and MARY LONG
Defendant:
AC&S, INC. , THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , M. H. DETRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEES v. A C & S, INC.
as 2:2010cv84530
Plaintiff:
JOHN LEES
Defendant:
A C & S, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IVY v. ZICKEFOOSE
as 1:2010cv00063
Petitioner:
JOHN LEE IVY
Respondent:
DONNA ZICKEFOOSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LEE v. ASBESTOSPRAY CORP. et al
as 2:2009cv87019
Plaintiff:
JOHN LEE
Defendant:
ASBESTOSPRAY CORP., GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LEE v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv76263
Plaintiff:
JOHN LEE
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
