Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Rolle v. City of Tallahassee et al
as 5:2018cv00025
Plaintiff:
Randall Lamont Rolle
Defendant:
City of Tallahassee, Owen McCaul, James Hankinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Randall Rolle v. City of Tallahassee Florida, et al
as 17-12689
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF TALLAHASSEE FLORIDA, ENTITY, LILJA M. DANDELAKE, ATTORNEY, JOHN MACELUCH, ASSISTANT STATE ATTORNEY and others
ROLLE v. TALLAHASSEE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2016cv00425
Plaintiff:
RANDALL ROLLE
Defendant:
TALLAHASSEE POLICE DEPARTMENT, MICHAEL DILMORE, HOLLY LOFLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROLLE v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE FLORIDA et al
as 4:2016cv00050
Plaintiff:
RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE
Defendant:
CITY OF TALLAHASSEE FLORIDA , M LILJA DANDELAKE , JOHN MACELUCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randall Rolle v. John Maceluch, et al
as 15-14656
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN MACELUCH, KATHLEEN KIRWIN and JAMES HANKINSON
Rolle v. Maceluch et al
as 5:2015cv00285
Plaintiff:
Randall Lamont Rolle
Defendant:
John Maceluch, Kathleen Kirwin and James Hankinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randall Rolle v. John Maceluch, et al
as 15-11874
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN MACELUCH, KATHLEEN KIRWIN and JAMES HANKINSON
Rolle v. Maceluch et al
as 5:2015cv00191
Plaintiff:
Randall Lamont Rolle
Defendant:
John Maceluch, Kathleen Kirwin and James Hankinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
ROLLE v. KIRWIN et al
as 4:2014cv00672
Plaintiff:
RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE
Defendant:
KATHLEEN KIRWIN, JOHN MACELUCH, STATE ATTORNEY OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rolle v. Kirwin et al
as 5:2014cv00681
Plaintiff:
Randall Lamont Rolle
Defendant:
Kathleen Kirwin, John Maceluch, State Attorney Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
