Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Michaud v. Clark et al
as 1:2023cv00774
Plaintiff:
John Michaud
Defendant:
Superintendent Gina Clark and Sergeant King-Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michaud v. Franklin County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00943
Plaintiff:
John Michaud
Defendant:
Franklin County Jail, William Bechtold, Deputy Warden Weller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michaud v. Sgt. Miller
as 3:2018cv00109
Plaintiff:
John Michaud
Defendant:
Sgt. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michaud v. Baker et al
as 3:2017cv00718
Defendant:
Mrs. Warden Baker, Mrs. Carpenter, Mr. Dzurenda and others
Plaintiff:
John Michaud
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michaud v. Aranas
as 3:2017cv00471
Defendant:
Dr. Aranas
Plaintiff:
John Michaud
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michaud v. Williams, et al.,
as 2:2015cv02324
Defendant:
Mr Adams, Mr Brooks, Mr Brown and others
Plaintiff:
John Michaud
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MICHAUD et al v. STATE OF MAINE et al
as 2:2014cv00221
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICHAUD and AMOS JOHNSON
Defendant:
STATE OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL, KEVIN JOYCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Michaud v. Robert Bannister, et al
as 09-17229
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN MICHAUD
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT BANNISTER, BRIAN WILLIAMS and UTILIZATION REVIEW COMMITTEE
Michaud v. Bannister et al
as 2:2008cv01371
Plaintiff:
John Michaud
Defendant:
Robert Bannister, Brian Williams and Utilization Review Committee
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LUCIANO et al v. VITIELLO et al
as 2:2007cv00025
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA LUCIANO , MICHAEL MELLEN and JOHN MICHAUD
Defendant:
MICHAEL VITIELLO , STEVEN A FOGLIO , YORK COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
