Cases 31 - 40 of 80
ROSARIO v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2013cv01945
Plaintiff:
JOSE ROSARIO
Defendant:
SETH WILLIAMS, JOHN DOYLE, EDWARD MCCANN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IAGOVINO v. FARRELL et al
as 2:2013cv01313
Plaintiff:
JOEL IAGOVINO
Defendant:
MICHELE FARRELL, JUANITA GOODMAN, KAREN BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Chavis v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 13-1556
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD CHAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER, SETH WILLIAMS and others
WATSON v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv00097
Plaintiff:
KAREEM WATSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, DOUGLAS GIORLA, JOHN P. DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VILLINES v. DELANEY
as 2:2013cv00086
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM VILLINES
Defendant:
JOHN P. DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREEN v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2012cv07266
Plaintiff:
ALBERT GREEN
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, DOUGLAS GIORLA, JOHN P. DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CYRUS et al v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2012cv07278
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL D. CYRUS, DAVID BRILL and ALBERTO GARCIA
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN P. DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALEXANDER v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2012cv06785
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RODNEY ALEXANDER
Defendant:
LOUIS GIORLA, JOHN P. DELANEY, CORIZON PRISON HEALTH SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wayne Prater v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 12-4259
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAYNE PRATER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, COMISSIONER OF (PPS) LOUIS GIORLA, WARDEN OF (CFCF) JOHN P. DELANEY and others
FANTAUZZI v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2012cv05931
Plaintiff:
JOSE LABOY FANTAUZZI
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, DOUGLAS GIORLA, JOHN P. DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
