Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Assoc. of American Railroads et al v. Randolph et al
as 2:2023cv01154
Plaintiff:
Association of American Railroads and American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association
Defendant:
Liane M. Randolph, John Eisenhunt, Susan Shaheen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Central CA Environmental Justice Network et al v. Randolph et al
as 2:2022cv01714
Plaintiff:
Central California Environmental Justice Network, Committee for a Better Arvin, Medical Advocates for Healthy Air and others
Defendant:
Liane Randolph, Steven Cliff, Sandra Berg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604 Clear Air Act (Emission Standards)
Rocky Mountain Farmers Union, et al v. Richard Corey, et al
as 17-16882
Plaintiff:
ROCKY MOUNTAIN FARMERS UNION, REDWOOD COUNTY MINNESOTA CORN AND SOYBEAN GROWERS, PENNY NEWMAN GRAIN, INC. and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION, FKA National Petrochemical & Refiners Association, AMERICAN TRUCKINGS ASSOCIATIONS and THE CONSUMER ENERGY ALLIANCE
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD W COREY, in his official capacity as Executive Officer of the California Air Resources Board, ALEXANDER SHERRIFFS, BARBARA RIORDAN and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
SIERRA CLUB, CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND and others
Rocky Mountain Farmers Union, et al v. Richard Corey, et al
as 17-16881
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROCKY MOUNTAIN FARMERS UNION, REDWOOD COUNTY MINNESOTA CORN AND SOYBEAN GROWERS, PENNY NEWMAN GRAIN, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION, FKA National Petrochemical & Refiners Association, AMERICAN TRUCKINGS ASSOCIATIONS and THE CONSUMER ENERGY ALLIANCE
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD W COREY, in his official capacity as Executive Officer of the California Air Resources Board, ALEXANDER SHERRIFFS, BARBARA RIORDAN and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
SIERRA CLUB, CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND and others
Rocky Mountain Farmers Union, et al v. James Goldstene, et al
as 12-15135
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROCKY MOUNTAIN FARMERS UNION, REDWOOD COUNTY MINNESOTA CORN AND SOYBEAN GROWERS, PENNY NEWMAN GRAIN, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES N. GOLDSTENE, in his officlal capacity as Executive Officer of the California Air Resources Board, MARY D. NICHOLS, DANIEL SPERLING and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC., SIERRA CLUB and others
Rocky Mountain Farmers Union, et al v. James Goldstene, et al
as 12-15131
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROCKY MOUNTAIN FARMERS UNION, REDWOOD COUNTY MINNESOTA CORN AND SOYBEAN GROWERS, PENNY NEWMAN GRAIN, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES N. GOLDSTENE, in his officlal capacity as Executive Officer of the California Air Resources Board, MARY D. NICHOLS, DANIEL SPERLING and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC., SIERRA CLUB and others
National Petrochemical & Refiners Association et al v. Goldstene et al
as 1:2010cv00163
Plaintiff:
National Petrochemical & Refiners Association, American Trucking Associations, Center for North American Energy Security and others
Defendant:
James Goldstene, Mary D Nichols, Daniel Sperling and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Rocky Mountain Farmers Union et al v. Corey, et al
as 1:2009cv02234
Plaintiff:
Rocky Mountain Farmers Union, Redwood County Minnesota Corn and Soybeans Growers, Penny Newman Grain, Inc. and others
Defendant:
James N. Goldstene, Mary D. Nichols, Daniel Sperling and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Sierra Club, Conservation Law Foundation and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of Oregon, Brazillian Sugar Cane Industry Association (UNICA), Oregon Petroleum Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
