Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Consolidation Coal Company, et al v. OWCP, et al
as 22-3476
Petitioner:
CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY and SMARTCASUALTYCLAIMS
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, BENEFITS REVIEW BOARD and JOHN T. ROBERTS
MCCULLOUGH v. DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv01563
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MCCULLOUGH
Defendant:
DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, INC. , LAMMOT J. DUPONT , MICHAEL A. COKE and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
LAWRENCE v. DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv01465
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LAWRENCE
Defendant:
DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, INC., LAMMOT J. DUPONT, MICHAEL A. COKE and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
CANCHOLA v. DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv01481
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CANCHOLA
Defendant:
DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, INC., LAMMOT J. DUPONT, MICHAEL A. COKE and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Lawrence v. Dupont Fabros Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02042
Plaintiff:
William Lawrence
Defendant:
Dupont Fabros Technology, Inc., Lammott J Dupont, Michael A. Coke and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
SCARANTINO v. DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv01428
Plaintiff:
LOUIS SCARANTINO
Defendant:
DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, INC., DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, L.P., LAMMOT J. DUPONT and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Robert et al v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv00957
Plaintiff:
John T. Robert and Claudia Roberts
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation , Stryker Sales Corporation , Stryker Ireland, LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
National Viatical, Incorporated et al v. United Fidelity Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv10484
Plaintiff:
National Viatical, Incorporated and NVT Trust
Defendant:
United Fidelity Corporation, TCI Agency, Incorporated, Surety Marketing Source, L. L. C. and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
