Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Ninth Amendment Party Association et al v. Rambosk et al
as 2:2023cv00830
Plaintiff:
Ninth Amendment Party Association and Milton Gerard Esquibel
Defendant:
Kevin Rambosk, Clovis Watson, Jr., Scotty Rhoden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARR v. TATE et al
as 5:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICAH CARR
Defendant:
JOHN TATE, CITY of BONIFAY, ROGER YOUNG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAVIES v. HOLMES COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
ANTWOIN DAVIES
Defendant:
HOLMES COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, JOHN TATE, MICHAEL RALEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOSES v. TATE et al
as 5:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
JASON S MOSES
Defendant:
JOHN TATE, ROY WADE, BAINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TATE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09663
Plaintiff:
JOHN TATE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
MCMILLAN v. HELMES et al
as 5:2021cv00156
Plaintiff:
BOBBY W MCMILLAN
Defendant:
JOHNATHAN HELMES and JOHN TATE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TATE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv15492
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN TATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TATE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv54602
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN TATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
