Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Louisiana Sheriffs Pension & Relief Fund et al v. Khosrowshahi et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2026cv07600
Plaintiff: Louisiana Sheriffs Pension & Relief Fund, Boynton Beach General Employees' Pension Plan and Steamfitters Local 449 Pension Fund
Defendant: Dara Khosrowshahi, Ronald Sugar, Revathi Advaithi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit v. Khosrowshahi et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2026cv06155
Plaintiff: Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit
Defendant: Dara Khosrowshahi, Ronald Sugar, Revathi Advaithi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Feghali Foods Inc. PSP v. Khosrowshahi et al
as 1:2024cv00758
Defendant: Ronald Sugar, Nikki Krishnamurthy, John Thain and others
Plaintiff: Feghali Foods Inc. PSP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Jain v. Khosrowshahi et al
as 1:2024cv00403
Plaintiff: Rohit Jain
Defendant: Dara Khosrowshahi, Ronald Sugar, Ursula Burns and others
Boston Retirement System, et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al
as 22-80076
Respondent: BOSTON RETIREMENT SYSTEM, DAVID MESSINGER, ELLIE MARIE TORONTO ESA and others
Petitioner: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., DARA KHOSROWSHAHI, NELSON CHAI and others
Messinger et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv08610
Defendant: Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Ryan Graves, Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: David Messinger, Joseph Cianci, Irving S. Braun and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Fazio v. Khosrowshahi et al
as 3:2020cv07916
Defendant: Uber Technologies Inc., David Trujillo, Ryan Graves and others
Plaintiff: Diego Fazio
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Stirratt v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv06361
Defendant: Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Ryan Graves, Ronald D. Sugar and others
Plaintiff: Benjamin Stirratt
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Effecten-Spiegel AG et al v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018mc00093
Petitioner: Effecten-Spiegel AG and ARFB Anlegerschutz UG
Respondent: Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. , Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. and John Thain
Cause Of Action: M 77 Application to have subpoena issued to person living in this district re: action in foreign cou
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1494
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?