Cases 1 - 10 of 14
CLEMONS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv01545
Petitioner:
JORDAN ALEXANDER CLEMONS
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp
RIVERA v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv01155
Petitioner:
WILLIAM RIVERA
Respondent:
SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL, SUPERINTENDENT STEVEN GLUNT and .SUPERINTENDENT TAMMY FERGUSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp
JORDAN v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv00086
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THAT STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, JOHN WETZEL and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADLEPHIA
Petitioner:
LEWIS M. JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp
MASON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2017cv03759
Petitioner:
LENWOOD MASON
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, CYNTHIA LINK and STEVEN GLUNT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MURPHY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2016cv01456
Petitioner:
KEVIN LEE MURPHY
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HITCHO v. WETZEL et al
as 5:2016cv01156
Petitioner:
GEORGE HITCHO , JR.
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE and MARK GARMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MARTIN v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2015cv01607
Petitioner:
JEFFREY ROBERT MARTIN
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, CYNTHIA LINK, MARJORIE FOX and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (DEATH PENALTY)
STATON v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2015cv00240
Petitioner:
ANDRE STATON
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE, FRANK TENNIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
SIMPSON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2015cv04510
Petitioner:
RASHEED SIMPSON
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL , ROBERT GILMORE , THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PADILLA v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2014cv00197
Petitioner:
MIGUEL PADILLA
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, ROBERT D. GILMORE, STEVEN GLUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
