Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jamarr Kuilan v. John Zimmerman, et al
as 22-5331
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMARR JUAN KUILAN
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN ZIMMERMAN, in his individual and official capacity as Assistant District Attorney, ROYCE TAYLOR, in his individual and official capacity, JENNINGS H. JONES, in his individual and official capacity District Attorney General and others
Courtney Logan v. Bill Haslam, et al
as 17-5423
Petitioner - Appellant:
COURTNEY R. LOGAN
Respondent - Appellee:
BILL HASLAM, ROBERT E. COOPER, JR., JOHN ZIMMERMAN and others
Courtney Logan v. Bill Haslam, et al
as 15-6120
Petitioner - Appellant:
COURTNEY R. LOGAN
Respondent - Appellee:
BILL HASLAM, ROBERT E. COOPER, JR., JOHN ZIMMERMAN and others
Logan v. Haslam et al
as 3:2015cv00787
Petitioner:
Courtney R. Logan
Respondent:
Bill Haslam, Robert Cooper, Jr., John Zimmerman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Royce Drennon v. Royce Taylor, et al
as 15-5613
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROYCE GAYLE DRENNON
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDGE ROYCE TAYLOR and ASSISTANT D.A. JOHN ZIMMERMAN
Drennon v. Taylor et al
as 3:2015cv00197
Plaintiff:
Royce G. Drennon
Defendant:
Royce Taylor and John Zimmerman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darnell v. Google, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01445
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brian Darnell
Defendant:
Google, Inc., Bandwith, Inc., Nuestar, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zimmerman v. Swarthout
as 2:2013cv01801
Petitioner:
Kenneth John Zimmerman
Respondent:
Gary Swarthout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Zimmerman v. Swarthout
as 2:2013at00995
Petitioner:
Kenneth John Zimmerman
Respondent:
Gary Swarthout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. MORALES et al
as 1:2008cv01011
Plaintiff:
JOHN SMITH
Defendant:
R. MORALES, D. BASADA, E. MEDINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
