Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Julian Rochester v. David McCall
as 11-6328
Petitioner - Appellant:
JULIAN EDWARD ROCHESTER
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID M. MCCALL, Warden of Perry Correctional Institution, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and JON OZMINT, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections
Gary Wise v. Jon Ozmint
as 09-7956
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY L. WISE
Defendant - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections, individually and in their official capacities, GREGORY KNOWLIN, Warden of Turbeville Correctional Institution TCI, individually and in their official capacities, MS. BRADSHAW, Associate Warden, individually and in their official capacities and others
Richard Blackburn v. State of South Carolina
as 09-6677
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD E. BLACKBURN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, JON OZMINT, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections, ROBERT S. WARDLAW, Regional Director of South Carolina Deparment of Corrections and others
Thomas Harley v. Doctor Beioh
as 09-6234
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS HARLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
DOCTOR BEIOH, Doctor at Kershaw Correctional Institution, NURSE GARDNER, Nurse at Kershaw Correctional Institution, LIEUTENANT ROBINSON, Lieutenant at Kershaw Correctional Institution and others
Muhammad Rahim v. Jon Ozmint
as 08-8423
Petitioner - Appellant:
MUHAMMAD ABDUL RAHIM, a/k/a Gary B. Myers, a/k/a Gary Bernard Myers
Respondent - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections
Respondent - None:
JAMES R. MCDONOUGH, Florida Department of Corrections
EuGene Clowers v. Jon Ozmint
as 08-6696
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE CLOWERS
Defendant - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections, COLIE RUSHTON, Warden of McCormick Correctional Institution, PARKER, of Classification, in their individual and official capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
