Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Cesar Aguirre v. Alameda County Superior Court, et al
as 21-16106
Respondent / Appellee:
JON ROLEFSON, The Honorable Judge, KAMALA D. HARRIS, NANCY O'MALLEY and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
CESAR AGUIRRE
Cesar Aguirre v. Alameda Superior Court et al
as 3:2016cv06933
Petitioner:
Cesar Aguirre
Respondent:
Alameda Superior Court , Kamala Harris, Nancy O'Malley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Olanapo Olajide v. Jon Rolefson
as 16-16642
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLANAPO OLAJIDE
Defendant - Appellee:
JON ROLEFSON
Olajide v. Rolefson
as 3:2016cv01163
Plaintiff:
Olanapo Ad Olajide
Defendant:
Jon Rolefson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bonilla v. Goodfellow et al
as 4:2012cv00360
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Jon Goodfellow, John Whitson, Bradley George Keyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pamela Drawsand v. F.F. Properties, L.L.P., et al
as 11-17752
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAMELA DRAWSAND
Defendant - Appellee:
F.F. PROPERTIES, L.L.P., FAIRFIELD BARRINGTON PROPERTIES, MONTELENA APARTMENT HOMES and others
Hung Ha v. Justine Tseng, et al
as 11-15926
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES HA
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTINE TSENG, ROBERT F. DE SMET and JON ROLEFSON
Ha v. Tseng et al
as 4:2011mc80021
Plaintiff:
James Ha
Defendant:
Justine Tseng, Robert F. de Smet and Jon Rolefson
Drawsand v. F.F. Properties, L.L.P. et al
as 4:2010cv03937
Plaintiff:
Pamela Drawsand
Defendant:
F.F. Properties, L.L.P., Fairfield Barrington Properties, Montelena Apartment Homes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drawsand v. F.F. Properties, L.L.P. et al
as 3:2010cv03937
Plaintiff:
Pamela Drawsand
Defendant:
F.F. Properties, L.L.P., Fairfield Barrington Properties, Montelena Apartment Homes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
