Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-1957
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Downeast Ventures Ltd. v. Washington, County of, et al
as 08-1935
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DOWNEAST VENTURES LTD.
Defendant - Appellee:
WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF, WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, JOSEPH TIBBETTS and others
Movant - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-1946
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Oxford County v. Riches, et al
as 08-1958
Plaintiff:
RUTH ANN BRAZIER
Defendant - Appellee:
OXFORD COUNTY and LLOYD HERRICK, Sheriff, Individually and in his official capacity as Oxford County Sheriff
Movant - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Choate v. Merrill, et al
as 08-1959
Plaintiff:
BRENDA CHOATE, Personal Represenative of the Estate of Ryan Rideout
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY MERRILL, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Warden, Maine Department of Corrections, NELSON REILLY, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Deputy Warden, Maine Department of Corrections, MICHAEL PETERS, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Prison Guard, Maine Department of Corrections and others
Defendant:
ROBERT BEARD, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Prison Guard, Maine Department of Corrections, KATE GERRISH, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Mental Health Worker, Maine Department of Corrections, KATE MATTHEWS, Individually and in her Official Capacity as a Mental Health Worker, Maine Department of Corrections and others
Movant - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
