Cases 41 - 50 of 3,960
United States of America v. Rivera-Figueroa (Andino)
as 24-431
Defendant:
CESAR RIVERA-FIGUEROA, JENHSEN RODRIGUEZ, DANIEL NAVARRO and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jones v. N.Y.P.D.
as 24-417
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
N.Y.P.D., New York Police Department 34th Precinct and MONTICELLO VILLAGE P.D.
Jones v. King
as 1:2024cv01330
Petitioner:
Fredrick Jones
Respondent:
M.J. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Blue Orange Digital, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01228
Plaintiff:
Celia Jones
Defendant:
Blue Orange Digital, INC, Blue Orange Digital, LLC, Josh Miramant and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA: Family and Medical Leave Act (Findings and Purposes)
Romano v. Brown
as 24-377
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ROMANO
Defendant:
C.O. R. BROWN, Sergeant J. JONES, T. MILLER, DSP and others
Jones v. Bronx Charter School for the Arts
as 1:2024cv01084
Plaintiff:
Erica Jones
Defendant:
Bronx Charter School for the Arts
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA: Family and Medical Leave Act (Findings and Purposes)
Blue Castle (Cayman) Ltd. v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv00953
Plaintiff:
Blue Castle (Cayman) Ltd.
Defendant:
David Jones, Jacqueline Callahan, Principis Capital, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191 Bank Foreclosure
Blue Castle (Cayman) Ltd. v. Jones et al
as 2:2024cv00953
Plaintiff:
Blue Castle (Cayman) Ltd.
Defendant:
David Jones, Jacqueline Callahan, Principis Capital, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191 Bank Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
