Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ocasio, et al v. Soto
as 14-1806
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESLIE OCASIO, GIL AGOSTO-SANTIAGO, LUIS ALDIVA-LOPEZ and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NEFTALI SOTO
Ocasio v. Soto et al
as 3:2013cv01699
Plaintiff:
Leslie Ocasio , Gil Agosto-Santiago , Luis R. Aldiva-Lopez and others
Defendant:
Neftali Soto , Jane Doe, Conjugal Partnership Soto-Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Quiles-Gonzalez, et al v. US, et al
as 10-1779
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACKELINE QUILES-GONZALEZ, IRMA GONZALEZ-RODRIGUEZ and EDWIN COLON-DIAZ
Defendant:
BANCO BILBAO VIZCAYA ARGENTARIA, DIONISIO RIVERA, JOYCE BRUNET-AMADOR and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Rios v. Sanchez-Lizardi et al
as 3:2009cv01788
Plaintiff:
Jaime Rios
Defendant:
Lourdes Sanchez-Lizardi and Jose D. Gonzalez-Montanez
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Quinones-Ortiz v. Gonzalez
as 3:2009cv01660
Plaintiff:
Maria Quinones-Ortiz
Defendant:
Jose M Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Charles Santana-Castro, et al v. Pedro Toledo-Davila, et al
as 08-1964
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES SANTANA-CASTRO, FELIX SANTANA-CARMONA and AIDA SANTANA-CASTRO
Defendant - Appellee:
PEDRO TOLEDO-DAVILA, Superintendent of the Puerto Rico Police Department, JOSE RAMOS-GONZALEZ, Commander of Fajardo Region, JOSE LEBRON-ALICEA, Supervisor and others
Alberto San, Inc. v. Consejo de Titulares, et al
as 07-1605
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERTO SAN, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
CONSEJO DE TITULARES CONSEJO DE TITULARES CONDOMINIO CLINICA LAS AMERICAS, ROBERTO VELEZ, DANIEL GARAVITO-MEDINA and others
Gonzalez-Morales et al v. Police Department of Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2007cv01310
Plaintiff:
Jose A. Gonzalez-Morales and Miriam J. Vega-Mena
Defendant:
Police Department of Puerto Rico, Commonwealth of Puerto R ico, Jose L. Abrams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
