Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Rodriguez et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-18947
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Rodriguez and Jose Luis Rodriguez
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Fray Lopez Rodriguez, et al v. SGLC, Inc., et al
as 12-80226
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
FRAY MARCELINO LOPEZ RODRIGUEZ, JOEL GONZALEZ AVILA, JUAN ALONSO BALON MARQUEZ and others
Defendant - Respondent:
SGLC, INC., SALVADOR GONZALEZ, JULIAN GONZALEZ and others
USA v. Jose Rodriguez-Martel
as 12-40451
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE LUIS RODRIGUEZ-MARTEL
USA v. Jose Rodriguez
as 11-50502
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE LUIS RODRIGUEZ
Tirado v. State of Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole
as 3:2011mc00077
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Rodriguez Tirado
Respondent:
State of Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole
USA v. Jose Rodriguez
as 11-50410
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE LUIS RODRIGUEZ, AKA Severo Hernandez, AKA Celestino Ayala Perez, AKA Jose Luis Morfin Rodriguez, AKA Severo Hernandez Rodriguez
United States v. Jose Rodriguez-Ramo
as 10-3769
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Jose Luis Rodriguez-Ramos
Jose Rodriguez Mendoza v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-73614
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS RODRIGUEZ MENDOZA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MARRIAGE INC v BROWNING, et al
as 1:2010cv00192
Plaintiff:
National Organization for Marriage, Inc.
Defendant:
DAWN K ROBERTS, JORGE L CRUZ-BUSTILLO, WILLIAM H HOLLIMON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00037
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
