Cases 1 - 10 of 12
MMG INSURANCE COMPANY V. SCHMIDT LANDSCAPING, INC. ET AL
as 2:2021cv01304
Petitioner:
MMG INSURANCE COMPANY
Respondent:
SCHMIDT LANDSCAPING, INC., GARY E. SCHMIDT, THERESE SCHMIDT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
MMG Insurance Company v. Schmidt Landscaping, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01597
Plaintiff:
MMG Insurance Company
Defendant:
Schmidt Landscaping, Inc., Gary E. Schmidt, Therese Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
ALCARAZ et al v. SCHMIDT LANDSCAPING, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00691
Defendant:
GARY E. SCHMIDT, PAUL HAUBER, EVERGREEN NURSERY, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LUIS HERNANDEZ SILVA, JOSE SANTANA ALCARAZ and JOSE AREVALO MENDOZA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BENOIT v. KANE et al
as 3:2018cv00080
Plaintiff:
AUNDEL BENOIT
Defendant:
RICHARD KANE, KATHLEEN KENNEY, J.L. NORWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KUZON v. LYNCH et al
as 3:2015cv00225
Petitioner:
WARREN KUZON
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, JOSE SANTANA and S. MILLION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LAFOND v. HOLDER et al
as 3:2015cv00120
Petitioner:
RAOUL LAFOND
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., CLIFTON THOMAS BARRETT, JOSE SANTANA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DELEON v. HOLDER et al
as 3:2015cv00060
Petitioner:
RICARDO DELEON
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JOSE SANTANA and MARK A. KIRBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LAFOND v. HOLDER et al
as 3:2015cv00028
Petitioner:
RAOUL LAFOND
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, LORETTA E. LYNCH, JOSE SANTANA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SERRANO v. HOLDER et al
as 3:2014cv00251
Petitioner:
MOISES SERRANO
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JOSE SANTANA and MARK A. KIRBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CHAPMAN v. HOLDER et al
as 3:2014cv00203
Petitioner:
LAMAR CHRISTOPHER CHAPMAN, III
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., JOSE SANTANA and MARK A. KIRBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
