Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Willis et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2023cv04868
Defendant:
The 3M Company, AGC, Inc., Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Willis, Thomas Cannon, Joe Bridge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02510
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02510
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bowrosen et al v. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2016cv08070
Plaintiff:
Virgina DeCola Bowrosen , Joseph Davi, Jr. , Robert Pellechia and others
Defendant:
The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602
Davis v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2015cv05900
Plaintiff:
Joseph Davis
Defendant:
City of New York, David Terrell and John Doe 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv07527
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer John Doe, Sergeant John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davi v. HDG Consulting Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv04531
Plaintiff:
Joseph Davi
Defendant:
Howard Glazer, Lauren Glazer, HDG Consulting Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Davis v. Perdue et al
as 9:2011cv01139
Plaintiff:
Joseph Davis
Defendant:
Russell A. Perdue, Deborah G. Schult, David Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv05679
Defendant:
City of New York, P.O.s John Doe #1-10 and Mark Kaufman
Plaintiff:
Joseph Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
