Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Earls v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 3:2018cv03769
Plaintiff:
Joseph Earls
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joseph Perry v. Pacific Maritime Industries Co, et al
as 17-55931
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH EARL PERRY, ex rel. United States of America
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
PACIFIC MARITIME INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, a California corporation, HARCON PRECISION METALS, INC., a California corporation and JOHN ATKINSON, an individual
Joseph Perry v. Pacific Maritime Indus. Corp., et al
as 17-55931
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH EARL PERRY, ex rel. United States of America
Defendant / Appellee:
PACIFIC MARITIME INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, a California corporation, HARCON PRECISION METALS, INC., a California corporation and JOHN ATKINSON, an individual
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Singleton v. State of Washington
as 2:2017cv00069
Petitioner:
Joseph Earl Singleton
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Joseph Earl Smith Jr v. Daniel Paramo
as 2:2015cv01391
Respondent:
Daniel Paramo
Petitioner:
Mr Joseph Earl Smith
Joseph Meling v. USA
as 14-71568
Petitioner:
JOSEPH EARL MELING
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Joseph Earl Smith, Jr. v. People for the State of California
as 2:2014cv04083
Respondent:
People for the State of California
Petitioner:
Joseph Earl Smith, Jr.
Joseph Smith, Jr. v. Daniel Paramo
as 14-55728
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH EARL SMITH, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden
Perry v. Pacific Martime Industries Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv02599
Plaintiff:
Joseph Earl Perry
Intervenor:
United States of America
Defendant:
Pacific Martime Industries Corporation , Harcon Precision Metals, Inc. and John Atkinson
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Joseph Earl Smith v. People for the State of Calif
as 2:2013cv03535
Respondent:
People for the State of Calif
Petitioner:
Joseph Earl Smith, Jr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
