Cases 1 - 10 of 25
JONES v. GANSKY et al
as 2:2023cv02967
Plaintiff:
MACK JONES
Defendant:
JOSEPH GANSKY, JOSEPH GEORGE, MATTHEW TOBIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Carter v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-16272
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH GEORGE CARTER
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Joseph Carter v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-16057
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH GEORGE CARTER
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Joseph Carter v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-16059
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH GEORGE CARTER
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Joseph Carter v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-15915
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH GEORGE CARTER
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Carellas v. Quinones, Jr et al
as 6:2022cv00173
Plaintiff:
Stephanos Joseph George Carellas and Stephanos Carellas
Defendant:
Louis A. Quinones, Jr and Dan Paxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph George v. USA, et al
as 21-5305
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph George
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America and Merrick B. Garland, United States Attorney General
GEORGE v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2021cv01672
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH GEORGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Shinn et al
as 3:2021cv08110
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Joseph George Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carter v. Shinn et al
as 3:2021cv08094
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Joseph George Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
