Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Johnson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02640
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JOHNSON
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dover v. Cuyahoga County et al
as 1:2023cv01453
Plaintiff:
Domenic Dover
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners, Armond Budish, Kenneth Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Johnson v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2022cv02655
Plaintiff:
Joseph Johnson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dover v. Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners, et al
as 1:2021cv01560
Plaintiff:
Domenic Dover
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners, Armond Budish, Earl Leiken and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wood v. Eubanks et al
as 3:2018cv00168
Plaintiff:
Michael A Wood
Defendant:
Chad Eubanks, Mario Troutman, Jr., Cherish Steiger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Sluterbeck v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00380
Plaintiff:
Nick Sluterbeck
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC and Joseph Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al
as 1:2015dp20218
Plaintiff:
Joseph Johnson
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp23310
Plaintiff:
Joseph Johnson
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Filing Error
as 1:2012cv02171
Plaintiff:
Joseph Johnson
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy, Inc., DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
