Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv10450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Franchi v. Orbotech Ltd. et al
as 1:2018cv00839
Plaintiff:
Anthony Franchi
Defendant:
Orbotech Ltd., Yochai Richter, Yehudit Bronicki and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
In Re: 3B Communication
as 15-1639
Plaintiff - Respondent:
KEREN AHARONI, DENNIS W. MOOREFIELD, FRED LAPORTE and others
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
3B COMMUNICATIONS G E S A
Defendant - Respondent:
ENZYMOTEC LTD, ARIEL KATZ, OREN BRYAN and others
Nominal Respondent:
MADELINE C. ARLEO
MOOREFIELD v. ENZYMOTEC LTD. et al
as 2:2014cv06075
Plaintiff:
DENNIS W. MOOREFIELD
Defendant:
ENZYMOTEC LTD. , ARIEL KATZ, OREN BRYAN and others
Movant:
3B COMMUNICATION G.E.S.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
AHARONI v. ENZYMOTEC LTD. et al
as 2:2014cv05556
Plaintiff:
AMRAM AHARONI
Defendant:
ENZYMOTEC LTD. , ARIEL KATZ, OREN BRYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Pipefitters Local 537 Annuity Fund v. Bronicki et al
as 3:2010cv00336
Defendant:
Lucien Y. Bronicki, Yehudit Bronicki, Yoram Bronicki and others
Nominal Plaintiff:
Ormat Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Pipefitters Local 537 Annuity Fund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
CURTIS v. ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 3:2010cv00198
Defendant:
YEHUDI BRONICKI, ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and JOSEPH TENNE
Plaintiff:
JOHN J CURTIS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Stebelton v. Ormat Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00156
Defendant:
Lucien Y. Bronicki, Yehudit Bronicki, Yoram Bronicki and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Stebelton
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Szymborski v. Ormat Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00132
Defendant:
Yehudit Bronicki, Ormat Technologies, Inc. and Joseph Tenne
Plaintiff:
Wayne Szymborski
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
